CONTENTS
CURRENT CRIMINAL LAW NEWS
TruTv (Formerly CourtTV)
BLAWGS* (BLOGS) WITH A CRIMINAL LAW BENT
Blawg Crime News - Unadorned news briefs.
Crime Scene KC - Kansas City, who cares? But the crime news is A-OK.
Grits for Breakfast - A progressive non-lawyer Texan writes about crim justice.
A Local Houston Criminal Lawyer's Local Blawg Lawyer Bennett
has a flair for writng and will keep you current on local courthouse info.
Res Ipsa Loquitur - Professor Turley's blawg; this guardian of the Constitution
was one of the few law professors in the country with the spine to go public
Crim Law Professors Blawg Worth a look, but plastered with and
subsidized by distracting law book publisher's ads.
White Collar Crime Blawg Pretty decent coverage.
The Race to the Bottom This one, focusing on corporate governance,
is a product of students and faculty at the University of Denver.
More Blawg Criminal Palaver I like his cartoons.
This lady lawyer has been gabbing on the web for years.
Crime and Consequences Blawg - This one is pro-prosecution.
Lexington Ky. Prosecutor Blawg - Need I say, it's pro-prosecution.
Clews - Here's a true-crime story blog.
This one also has a long list of other capital punishment blawgs.
This one has hyperlinks to the best crim law blawgs.
It's also replete with law book publisher's ads.
Crim Law Blawg Search (226 of 'em ranked in order of current activity)
BLAWGS WITH GENERAL LEGAL INFORMATION
Above the Law Tabloidy
Becker-Posner Blog This one, in an intellectual league apart, presents
two of our most brilliant thinkers, Judge Richard A. Posner **
of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals and Gary Becker.
* A law blog (blawg) is a web site maintained by an opinionated and enthusiastic lawyer/professor.
They come and go by the fistful, but some of the survivors keep on ginning out good info.
As blawgs mature, so the content can become more provocative and useful;
in the early stages it's often mere egotistical prattle and jawboning.
Good blawgs have frequent updates and links to other blawgs.
There are presently several thousand of them.
Good on ya, Murgatroid!
**Posner is the author of A Failure of Capitalism: The Crisis of '08 and the Descent into Depression (2009).
SCHOLARLY PUBLICATIONS DEVOTED
to
CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
If you like reading about criminal law, the Ohio Journal of Criminal Law, run by our
pal Dressler, is on-line with some free downloadable crim law articles. See below.
Georgetown University Law Center - 4X (published 4 times per year)
600 New Jersey Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
(202) 662 - 9250
(You'll pay these DC folks for any of the ACLR articles on-line. Use the law library.)
University of Texas School of Law - 3X
P.O. Box 8670
Austin, Texas 78713
(512) 232-1149
(These Texans from my alma mater require that you pay for
any of the AJCL articles. Use the law library.)
Cumberland School of Law of Samford University
800 Lakeshore Drive, Suite 301
Birmingham, AL 35229
493A Simon Hall
University of California, Berkeley
School of Law
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
State University of New York at Buffalo Law School - 2X530
John Lord O'Brian Hall
Buffalo, New York 14260
(716) 645-2016
Note: This previously excellent review still has some of its articles from 1999-2005
online for free in PDF format. In 2007 it morphed into a strictly cash
commercial operation in new wrappings dubbed The New Criminal Law Review, see below.
School of Law - Boalt Hall
University of California
Berkeley, California
(Coin of the realm is required by this Golden State review. Use the law library.)
Virginia Capital Case Clearinghouse
School of Law
Washington & Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8557
Department of Criminal Justice and Behavior - 4X
California State University
1250 Bellflower Boulevard
Long Beach, California 90840
Castine Research Corporation - 1X
40 Main Street
Castine, Maine 04421
(207) 326-9521
(Note: A few articles from this publication of the ABA Criminal Justice Section are now
viewable on-line for free, but most require that you pay up for a ABA and CJS membership.)
Institute for Criminal Justice Ethics - 2X
John Jay College of Criminal Justice
555 West 57th Street, Suite 601
New York, New York 10019
Department of Psychology - 2X
Fordham University
Bronx, New York 10458
Newsletter
James E. Robertson
Department of Sociology and Corrections
Minnesota State University
Mankato, MN 56001
(You'll pay Thompson-West Publishing for this publication.)
Official Journal of the Society for the Reform of Criminal Law
Rutgers University School of Law - Camden - 3X
Fifth & Penn Streets
Camden, New Jersey 08102
(856) 225-6352
(Viewable online in PDF format. Ave CLF!)
Administrative Office of the United States Courts - 3X
One Columbus Circle
Washington, D.C. 20544
(202) 502-2600
323 Green Street - 6X
New Haven, Connecticut 06511
(203) 772-2543
(Costly.)
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 662-9890
Northwestern University School of Law - 4X
357 East Chicago Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60611
(312) 503- 8547
(There is nothing free from these Lakeshore Drive denizens of my alma mater.
Go to the law library for the text of the articles.)
P.O. Box 131279
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48113
Note: Bully to this journal for placing its articles on-line for free.
State University of New York at Buffalo Law School
530 O'Brian Hall
Buffalo, New York 14260
(This was formerly the excellent Buffalo Criminal Law Review but has morphed
into a cash-on-the-line operation.Save your money. Use the law library.)
New England School of Law - 2X
154 Stuart Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
(617) 422-7451
Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law (CCJA Rating: Top-Gun)
The Ohio State University - 2X
Moritz College of Law
55 West 12th Avenue
Columbus, Ohio 43210
(614) 688-3781
(This one is the big-boy-on-the-block, guided by criminal law gurus Berman,
Dressler, and Michaels. The PDF form of the Ohio St. J. Crim. L. graciously
allows you to view and print its excellent articles for free.)
National District Attorneys Association
44 Cana Center Plaza, Suite 110
Alexandria, VA 22314
(Nothing is free here. All articles are locked-down.)
Institute of Bill of Rights Law
William and Mary Law School
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
(The home page contains hyperlinks to numerous free online notes.)
Department of Criminal Justice - 4X
Shippensburg University
1871 Old Main Drive
Shippensburg, Pennsylvania 17257
(717) 477-1608
(Professors Kahan and Robinson have accumulated hundreds of abstracts in their
SSRN - Social Science and Research Network - criminal law and criminal procedure database;
the site has a number of specialized research networks including legalk scholarship; many free downloads are available; sign in/join here.)
(This world resource includes sixty-six (66) free legal journals, few criminal.)
Bibliographies
References & Encyclopedias
(Economics of Crime and Law Enforcement)
Bibliography of
SELECTED RECENT AND CLASSIC SCHOLARLY ARTICLES
on
CRIMINAL LAW SUBJECTS
There are more than 500 student-edited law reviews and journals published in the US. Those produced at first and second-tier law schools, e.g., Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Pennsylvania, Chicago, Virginia, Northwestern, Columbia, California, Michigan, Texas, Duke, Georgetown, North Carolina, UCLA, Cornell, etc. are typically of excellent quality and are often cited by other journals and in court opinions. The same cannot be said for the publications of third and fourth-tier institutions. Articles and comments from these institutions can only be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Here's an unofficial ranking from a law librarian. See Richard A. Posner, The Future of the Student-Edited Law Review, 47 Stan. L. Rev. 1131 (1995). (Posner is a jurist on the 7th Circuit and co-author of one of the best blawgs extant.)
What I have collected here is a potpourri of scholarly publications, most of them fairly recent, on subjects close to the heart of the study of substantive criminal law. Students may find it helpful in providing context for briefing and reciting on individual cases to read a relevant resource listed below and
share valuable aspects of it with other members of the class in e-discussion postings
and in class recitations.
Notice that I don't utilize the classic green book or blue-book style of citation. Do not emulate my approach in citing any of these secondary resources in briefs filed with courts or in your
Legal Research and Writing courses. I simply find the style that follows more informative.
To find an article in a particular journal or law review, try the Guide to Current Law Review Content.
+ Leonard, Towards a Legal History of American Criminal Theory: Culture and Doctrine from Blackstone to the Model Penal Code, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 2, page 691 (2004).
Rethinking Criminal Law
+ Symposium, Twenty-Five Years of George Fletcher's Rethinking Criminal Law, Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 39, page 737 (2004).
+ Denno, When Two Become One: Views on Fletcher's 'Two Patterns of Criminality', Tulsa Law Review Vol. 39, page 781 (2004).
Statutory Construction
+ Meares, et al, The Wages of Antiquated Procedural Thinking: A Critique of Chicago v. Morales, 1988 University of Chicago Legal Forum, Vol 197.
+ Shapiro, Continuity and Change in Statutory Interpretation, N.Y.U. Law Review, Vol. 67, page 921 (1992).
+ Kelman, Interpretive Construction in the Substantive Criminal Law, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 33, page 591 (1981).
Purpose of Criminal Law
+ Ashworth, Concepts of Overcriminalization, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 5, page 401 (2008).
+ Luna, Principled Enforcement of Penal Codes, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol. 4, page 515 (2000).
+ Dworkin, Devlin Was Right: Law and the Enforcement of Morality, William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 40, page 959 (1999).
+ Robinson, A Functional Analysis of Criminal Law, Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 88, page 857 (1994).
+ Dressler, Hating Criminals: How Can Something that Feels So Good Be Wrong?, University of Michigan Law Review, Vol. 88, page 1148 (1990).
+ Posner, An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 85, page 1193 (1985).
+ Seidman, Soldiers, Martyrs, and Criminals: Utilitarian Theory and the Problem of Crime Control, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 94, page 315 (1984).
+ Hughes, Criminal Responsibility, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 16, page 470 (1964).
+ Hart, The Aims of the Criminal Law, Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 23, page 401 (1958).
Model Penal Code (Note: Professor Herbert Wechsler is generally viewed as the father of the Model Penal Code.)
+ Symposium on the Model Penal Code, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 63, page 589 (1963).
+ Lynch, Revising the Model Penal Code: Keeping It Real, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 1, page 219 (2003)
+ Dubber, Penal Panopticon: The Idea of a Modern Model Penal Code, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol. 4, page 53 (2000).
+ Kadish, The Model Penal Code's Historical Antecedents, Rutgers Law Journal, Vol. 19, page 521 (1988).
+ Robinson & Grall, Element Analysis in Defining Criminal Liability, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 35, page 681 (1983).
+ Wechsler, Codification of the Criminal Law in the United States:The Model Penal Code, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 68, page 1424 (1968).
+ Packer, The Model Penal Code and Beyond, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 63, page 594 (1963).
+ Wechsler, A Thoughtful Code of Substantive Law, Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, Vol. 45, page 524 (1955).
+ Wechsler, The Challenge of a Model Penal Code, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 65, page 1097 (1952).
+ Goldsmith, The Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine in the Supreme Court, Revisited, American Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 30, No. 2, page 135 (2003).
+ Decker, Addressing Vagueness, Ambiguity, and Other Uncertainly in American Criminal Laws, Denver University Law Review, Vol. 80, page 241 (2002).
+ Hill, Vagueness and Police Discretion: The Supreme Court in a Box, Rutgers Law Review, Vol. 51, page 1289 (1999).
+ Allen, The Erosion of Legality in American Criminal Justice: Some Latter-Day Adventures of the Nulla Poena Principle, Arizona Law Review, Vol. 29, Page 387 (1987).
+ Jeffries, Legality, Vagueness, and the Construction of Penal Statutes, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 71, page 189 (1985).
+Slobogin, Experts, Mental States, and Acts, Seton Hall Law Review, Vol. 38, page 1009 (2008).
+ Hamdani, Mens Rea and the Cost of Ignorance, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 2, page 415 (2007).
+ Simons, Should the Model Penal Code's Mens Rea Provisions Be Amended?, Ohio State Criminal Law Journal,
Vol. 1, page 179 (2003).
+ Batey, Exploitation of Mens Rea Confusion, At Common Law and Under the Model Penal Code, Georgia State University Law Review , Vol. 18, page 341 (2001).
+ Singer, The Model Penal Code and Three Two (and Possibly Only One) Ways Courts Avoid Mens Rea, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol.4, page 139 (2000).
+ Dillof, Transferred Intent: An Inquiry into the Nature of Criminal Culpability, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol 1, page 501 (1998).
+ Garfield, A More Principled Approach to Criminalizing Negligence: A Prescription for the Legislature, Tennessee Law Review, Vol. 65, page 875 (1998).
+ Simmons, When Is Strict Liability Just?, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 87, page 1075 (1997).
+ Husak, Transferred Intent, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, Vol.10, page 65 (1965).
+ Gardner, The Mens Rea Enigma: Observations on the Role of Motive in the Criminal Law Past and Present, 1993 Utah Law Review, page 635.
+ Williams, The Unresolved Problem of Recklessness, Legal Studies, Vol. 8, page 74 (1988).
+ Roth, The Felony-Murder Rule: A Doctrine at Constitutional Crossroads, Cornell Law Review, Vol. 70, page 446 (1985).
+ Moore, Responsibility and the Unconscious, Southern California Law Review, Vol. 53, page 1563 (1980).
+ Fletcher, The Theory of Criminal Negligence: A Comparative Analysis, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 119, pages 401 (1971).
+ Hall, Negligent Behavior Should Be Excluded From Penal Liability, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 63, page 662 (1963).
+ Wasserstrom, Strict Liability in the Criminal Law, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 12, page 731 (1960).
+Sayre, Mens Rea, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 45, page 974 (1932).
+ Perkins, A Rationale of Mens Rea, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 52, page 905 (1939).
+ Perkins, Malice Aforethought, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 43, page 537 (1934).
+ Ninth Circuit Holds That Motive Is Not an Element of Willful Blindness, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 121, page 1245 (2008).
+ Luban, Contrived Ignorance, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 87, page 957 (1999).
+ Marcus, Model Penal Code Section 2.02(7) and Willful Blindness, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 102, page 2231 (1993).
+ Robbins, The Ostrich Instruction: Deliberate Ignorance as a Criminal Mens Rea, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Vol. 81, page 191 (1990).
+ Curenton, The Past, Present, and Future of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 4: An Exploration of the Federal Misprison of Felony Statute, Alabama Law Review, Vol. 55, page 183 (2003).
+ Denno, Crime and Consciousness: Science and Involuntary Acts, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 87 page 269 (2002).
+ Dubber, Policing Possession: The War on Crime and the End of Criminal Law, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Vol. 91, page 829 (2002).
+ Thompson, The White-Collar Police Force: "Duty to Report" Statutes in Criminal Law Theory, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 11, page 3 (2002).
+ Smith, Legal Liability and Criminal Omission, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol. 5, page 69 (2001).
+ Murphy, Beneficence, Law, and Liberty: The Case of Required Rescue, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 89, page 605 (2001).
Dressler, Some Brief Thoughts (Mostly Negative) About "Bad Samaritan" Laws, Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 40, page 971 (2000).
+ Simester, On the So-Called Requirement for Voluntary Action, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol. 1, page 403 (1998).
+ Fletcher, On the Moral Irrelevance of Bodily Movements, Univeristy of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 142, page 1443 (1994)
+ Yeager, A Radical Community of Aid: A Rejoinder to Opponents of Affirmative Duties to Help Strangers, Washington University Law Quarterly, Vol. 71, page 1 (1993).
+ Leavens, A Causation Approach to Criminal Omissions, California Law Review, Vol. 76, pages 547 (1988).
+ Saunders, Voluntary Acts and the Criminal Law: Justifying Culpability Based on the Existence of Volition, University of Pittsburg Law Review, Vol. 49, page 433 (1988).
+ Smith, Liability for Omission in Criminal Law, Legal Studies, Vol. 14, page 88 (1984).
+ Keisel, Who Saw This Happen - States Move to Make Crime Bystanders Responsible, American Bar Association Journal, Vol. 69, page 1208 (1983).
+ Hughes, Criminal Omissions, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 67, page 590 (1958).
+ Morse, The Moral Metaphysics of Causation and Results, California Law Review, Vol. 88, page 879 (2000).
+ Robertson, Respect for Life in Bioethical Dilemmas, Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 45, page 329 (1997).
+ Kadish, Letting Patients Die: Legal and Moral Reflections, California Law Review, Vol. 80, page 857 (1992).
+ Terry, Homicide: The Viability of the Year and a Day Murder Rule, Howard Law Journal, Vol. 31. page 401(1988).
+Dressler, Reforming Complicity Law: Trivial Assistance as a Lesser Offense?, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 5, page 427 (2008).
+ Bird, The Natural and Probable Consequences Doctrine: "Your Acts Are My Acts!," Western State University Law Review, Vol. 34, page 43 (2006).
+ Noferi, Towards Attenuation: A "New" Due Process Limit on Pinkerton Conspiracy Liability, American Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 33, No. 2,page 91 (2006).
+ Weisberg, Reappraising Complicity, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol. 4, page 217 (2000).
+ Yeager, Helping, Doing, and the Grammar of Complicity, Criminal Justice Ethics, Vol. 15, page 25 (1996).
+ Robbins, Double Inchoate Crimes, Harvard Journal on Legislation, Vol. 26, page 1 (1989).
+ Dressler, Reassessing the Theoretical Underpinnings of Accomplice Liability: New Solutions to an Old Problem, Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 37, page 91 (1985).
+ Kadish, Complicity, Cause and Blame,: A Study in the Interpretation of Doctrine, California Law Review, Vol. 73, page 323 (1985).
+ Robinson, Imputed Criminal Liability, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 93, page 609 (1984).
+ Perkins, Parties to Crimes, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 89, page 581 (1941).
+ Cahil, Attempt, Reckless Homicide, and the Design of Criminal Law, University of Colorado Law Review, Vol. 78, page 879 (2007)
+ Morse, Reason, Results and Criminal Responsibility, University of Illinois Law Review, page 363 (2004)
+ Alexander, Mens Rea and Inchoate Crimes, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Vol. 87, page 1138 (1997).
+ Crocker, Justice in Criminal Liability: Decriminalizing Harmless Attempts, Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 53, page 1057 (1992).
+ Ashworth, Criminal Attempts and the Role of the Resulting Harm Under the Code and in the Common Law, Rutgers Law Journal, Vol. 19, page 725 (1988).
+ Keedy, Criminal Attempts at Common Law, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 102, page 464 (1954).
+ Westen, Impossibility Attempts: A Speculative Thesis, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 5, page 523 (2008).
+ Hasnas, Once More Unto the Breach: The Inherent Liberalism of the Criminal Law and the Liability for Attempting the Impossible, Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 54, page 1 (2002).
+ Zimmerman, Attempted Stalking: An Attempt-to-Almost-Attempt-to-Act, Northern Illinois University Law Review, Vol. 20, page 219 (2000).
+ Hoeber, The Abandonment Defense to Criminal Attempt and Other Problems of Temporal Individuation, California Law Review, Vol. 74, page 377 (1986).
+ Robbins, Attempting the Impossible: The Emerging Consensus, Harvard Journal on Legislation, Vol. 23, page 377 (1986).
+ Enker, Impossibility in Criminal Attempts - Legality and the Legal Process, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 53, page 665 (1969).
+ Hughes, One Further Footnote on Attempting the Impossible, New York University Law Review, Vol. 42, page 1005 (1967).
+ Ohlin, Group Think: The Law of Conspiracy and Collective Reason, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Vol. 98, page 147 (2007).
+ Rosenberg, Several Problems in Criminal Conspiracy Laws and Some Proposals for Reform, Criminal Law Bulletin, Vol. 43, No. 4, page 427 (2007).
+ Katyl, Conspiracy Theory, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 112, No 6, page 1307 (2003).
+ Cohan, Seditious Conspiracy, The Smith Act, and Prosecution for Religious Speech Advocating the Violent Overthrow of Government, St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, Vol. 17, Issue 2, page 199 (2003).
+ Genco, What Happened to Durland?: Mail Fraud, RICO, and Justifiable Reliance, Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 68, page 333 (1992).
+ Marcus, Criminal Conspiracy: Time to Turn Back from an Ever Expanding, Ever More Troubling Area, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 1, page 1 (1992).
+ Lynch, RICO: The Crime of Being a Criminal, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 87, page 920 (1987).
+ Johnson, The Unnecessary Crime of Conspiracy, California Law Review, Vol. 61, page 1137 (1973).
+ Goldstein, Conspiracy to Defraud the United States, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 68, page 405 (1959).
+ Harno, Intent in Criminal Conspiracy, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 89, page 624 (1941).
+ Duffy, Reality Check: How Practical Circumstances Affect the Interpretation of Depraved Indifference Murder, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 57, No. 2, page 425 (2007).
+ Cohne-Almagor, Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in the Democratric World: A legal Overview, New York International Law Review, Vol. 16, page 1 (2003).
+ Kamisar, Physician-Assisted Suicide: The Problems Presented by the Compelling, Heartwrenching Case, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 88, page 1121 (1998).
+ Robertson, Respect for Life in Bioethical Dilemmas, Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 45, page 329 (1997).
+ Oberman, Mothers Who Kill: Coming to Terms with Modern American Infanticide, American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 34, page 1 (1996).
+ Newman, Euthanasia: Orchestrating, "The Last Syllable of ...Time," University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 53, page 153 (1991).
+ Pillsbury, Evil and the Law of Murder, University of California at Davis Law Review, Vol. 24, page 437 (1990).
+ Peters, The State's Interest in the Preservation of Life: From Quinlan to Cruzan, Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 50, page 891 (1989).
+ Kamisar, Some Non-Religious Views Against Proposed "Mercy-Killing" Legislation, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 42, page 969 (1958).
+ Williams, "Mercy Killing" Legislation: A Rejoinder, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 43, page 1 (1958).
+ Michael & Wechsler, A Rationale of the Law of Homicide, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 37, page 701 (1937).
+ Binder, The Culpability of the Felony Murder, Notre Dame Law Review, Vol.83, page 965 (2008).
+ Birdsong, The Felony Murder Doctrine Revisited: A Proposal for Calibrating Punishment that Reaffirms the Sanctity of Human Life of Co-Felons Who Are Victims, Ohio Northern University Law Review, Vol. 33, page 497 (2007).
+ Binder, Felony Murder and Mens Rea Default Rules: A Study in Statutory Interpretation, 4 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 399 (2000).
+ Tomkovicz, The Endurance of the Felony-Murder Rule: A Study of the Forces That Shape Our Criminal Law, Washington & Lee Law Review, Vol. 51, page 1429 (1994).
+ Crump, In Defense of the Felony-Murder Doctrine, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Volume 8, page 359 (1985)
+ Fletcher, Reflections of Felony-Murder, Southwestern University Law Review, Vol. 12, page 413 (1981).
+ Kent, The Non-Violent Homosexual Advance Is Insufficient Evidence of Provocation, University of San Francisco Law Review, Vol. 44, page 155 (2009).
+ Bennardo, Of Ordinariness and Excuse: Heat -of-Passion and the Seven Deadly Sins, Capital University Law Review, Vol. 36, page 675 (2008).
+ Rozelle, Controlling Passion: Adultery and the Provocation Defense, 37 Rutgers Law Journal 197 (2005).
+ Garvey, Passion's Puzzle, Iowa Law Review, Vol. 90, page 1677 (2005)
+ Dressler, Why Keep the Provocation Defense? Some Reflections on a Difficult Subject, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 86, page 959 (2002). (Westlaw: 86 MNLR 959)
+ Miller, Womanslaughter: Voluntary Manslaughter, Gender, and the Model Penal Code, Emory Law Journal, Vol. 50, page 665 (2000).
+ Nourse, Passion's Progress: Modern Law Reform and the Provocation Defense, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 106 , page 1331 (1997).
+ Dressler, When "Heterosexual" Men Kill "Homosexual" Men: Reflections on Provocation Law, Sexual Advances, and the "Reasonable Man" Standard, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 85, page 726 (1995).
+ Coker, Heat of Passion and Wife Killing: Men Who Batter/Men Who Kill, Southern California Review of Law & Women's Studies, Vol. 71, page 71 (1992).
+ Mison, Homophobia in Manslaughter: The Homosexual Advance as Insufficient Provocation, California Law Review, Vol. 80, page 133 (1992).
+ Morse, Undiminished Confusion in Diminished Capacity, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Vol. 75, page 1 (1984).
+ Dressler, Rethinking Heat of Passion: A Defense in Search of a Rationale, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 73, page 421 (1982).
+ Perkins, An Analysis of Assault and Attempts to Assault, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 47, page 71 (1962).
+ Parks, et al, "Nigger": A Critical Race Realist Analysis of the N-Word Within Hate Crimes Law, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Vol. 98, No. 4, page 1305 (2008).
+ Abrams, Fighting Fire with Fire: Rethinking the Role of Disgust in Hate Crimes, California Law Review, Vol. 90 (2002).
+ Bandes, Child Rape, Moral Outrage, and the Death Penalty, Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 103, page 17 (2008).
+ Duncan, Sex Crimes and Sexual Miscues: The Need for a Clear Line Between Forcible Rape and Nonconsensual Sex, Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 4, page 1087 (2007).
+ Westen, Some Common Confusions About Consent in Rape Cases, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 2, No. 1, page 332 (2004).
+ Fisher, Unraveling the Fear of Victimization Among College Women: Is the "Shadow of Sexual Assault Hypothesis" Supported?, Justice Quarterly, Vol. 20, page 633 (2003).
+ Bryden, Redefining Rape, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol. 3, page 317 (2000).
+ Garrison, Rape Trauma Syndrome: A Review of a Behavioral Science Theory and Its Admissibility in Criminal Trials, American Journal of Trial Advocacy, Vol. 23, page 591 (2000).
+ Hasday, Contest and Consent, A Legal History of Marital Rape, California Law Review, Vol. 88, page 1373 (2000).
+ Jones, Sex, Culture, and the Biology of Rape: Toward Explanation and Prevention, California Law Review, Vol. 87, page 827 (1999).
+ Falk, Rape by Fraud and Rape by Coercion, Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 64, page 39 (1998).
+ Bryden, et al, Rape in the Criminal Justice System, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 87, page 1194 (1997).
+ Baker, Once a Rapist? Motivational Evidence and Relevancy in Rape Law, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 110, page 563 (1997).
+ Larson, "Even a Worm Will Turn at Last": Rape Reform in Late Nineteenth-Century America, Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, Vol. 9, page 1 (1997).
+ Spohn, et al, The Impact of Rape Law Reform on the Processing of Simple and Aggravated Rape Cases, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 86, page 861 (1996).
+ Tazlitz, Patriarchal Stories I: Cultural Rape Narratives in the Courtroom, Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies, Vol. 5, page 387 (1996).
+ Maguigan, Cultural Evidence and Male Violence: Are Feminist and Multicultural Reformers on a Collision Course in Criminal Courts?, New York University Law Review, Vol. 70, page 36 (1995).
+ Scalo, What Does "No" Mean in Pennsylvania? - The Pennsylvania Supreme Court's Interpretation of Rape and the Effectiveness of the Legislature's Response, Villanova Law Review, Vol. 40, page 193 (1995).
Siegel, The Marital Rape Exemption: Evolution to Extinction, Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 43, page 351 (1995).
+ Oberman, Turning Girls Into Women: Re-Evaluating Modern Statutory Rape Law, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 87, page 15 (1994).
+ Bachman & Paternoster, A Contemporary Look at the Effects of Rape Law Reform : How Far Have We Really Come?, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Vol. 84, page 554 (1993).
+ Roberts, Rape, Violence, and Women's Autonomy, Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 69, page 359 (1993).
+ Schafran, Writing and Reading About Rape: A Primer, St. Johns Law Review, Vol. 66, page 981 (1993).
+ Sitton, Old Wine in New Bottles: The "Marital" Rape Allowance, North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 72, page 261 (1993).
+ Henderson, Rape and Responsibility, Law & Philosphy, Vol. 11, page 127 (1992).
+ Schulhofer, Taking Sexual Autonomy Seriously: Rape Law and Beyond, Law and Philosophy, Vol. 11, page 35 (1992).
+ Berliner, Rethinking the Reasonable Belief Defense to Rape, 100 Yale L. J. 2687 (1991).
+ Estrich, Sex at Work, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 43, page 813 (1991).
+ Torrey, When Will We Be Believed? Rape Myths and the Idea of a Fair Trial in Rape Prosecutions, Vol. 24, University of California at Davis Law Review, Vol. 24, page 1013 (1991).
+ Estrich, Defending Women, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 88, page 1430 (1990).
+ West, Equality Theory, Marital Rape, and the Promise of the Fourteenth Amendment, University of Florida Law Review, Vol. 42, page 45 (1990).
+ Myers, et al, Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Litigation, Nebraska Law Review, Vol. 68, page 1 (1989).
+ Berger, Review Essay - Not So Simple Rape, Criminal Justice Ethics, Vol. 7, page 69 (1988).
+ Wicktom, Focusing on the Offender's Forceful Conduct: A Proposal for the Redefinition of Rape Laws, George Washington Law Review, Vol. 56, page 399 (1988).
+ Estrich, Rape, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 95, page 1087 (1986).
+ To Have to Hold: The Marital Rape Exemption and the Fourteenth Amendment, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 99, page 1255 (1986).
+ Massaro, Experts, Psychology, Credibility, and Rape: The Rape Trauma Syndrome Issue and Its Implications for Expert Psychological Testimony, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 69, page 395 (1985).
+ McCord, The Admissibility of Expert Testimony Regarding Rape Trauma Syndrome in Rape Prosecutions, Boston College Law Review, Vol. 26, page 1143 (1985).
+ Weiner, Shifting the Communication Burden: A Meaningful Consent Standard in Rape, Harvard Women's Law Journal, Vol. 6, page 143 (1983).
+ Sorrel & Masters, Sexual Molestation of Men by Women, Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 11, No.2, page 117 (1982).
+ Burt, Cultural Myths and Supports for Rape, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 38, page 217 (1980).
+ Harris, Towards a Consent Standard in the Law of Rape, University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 43, page 613 (1976).
+ Burgess et al, Rape Trauma Syndrome, American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 131, page 981 (1974).
+ Legrand, Rape and Rape Laws: Sexism in Society and Law, California Law Review, Vol. 61, page 919 (1973).
+ Pillsbury, Crimes Against the Heart, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 3 (2002).
+ Husak, Date Rape, Social Convention and Reasonable Mistakes, Law and Philosophy, Vol. 11, page 95 (1992).
+ Balos & Fellows, Guilty of the Crime of Trust: Nonstranger Rape, Minnesota Law Review, Vol 75, page 599 (1991).
+ Koss, et al, Nonstranger Sexual Aggression: A Discriminant Analysis of the Psychological Characteristics of Undetected Offenders, Sex Roles, Vol. 12, page 981 (1985).
+ Higdon, Queer Teens and Legislative Bullies: The Cruel and Invidious Discrimination Behind Heterosexist Statutory Rape Laws, UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 42, page 195 (2008).
+ Carpenter, On Statutory Rape, Strict Liability, and the Public Welfare Offense Model, American University Law Review, Vol. 53, No. 2, page 313 (2003).
+ Olsen, Statutory Rape: A Feminist Critique of Rights Analysis, Texas Law Review, Vol. 63, page 387 (1984).
+Podgor, White Collar Crime: A Letter from the Future, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 5, No. 1, page 247 (2007).
+ Green, Moral Ambiguity in White Collar Criminal Law, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy, Vol. 18, page 501 (2004).
+ Malloy, Regulation, Compliance and the Firm, Temple Law Review, Vol. 76, page 451 (2003).
+ Moohr, An Enron Lesson: The Modest Role of Criminal Law in Preventing Corporate Crime, Florida Law Review, Vol. 55, No. 4, page 937 (2003).
+ Survey of White Collar Crime, American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 2 (2003).
+ Geraghty, Corporate Criminal Liability, American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 39, page 327 ( 2002).
+ Brown, The Corporate Director's Compliance Oversight Responsibility in Post Caremark Era, The Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, Vol. 26, page 1 (2001).
+Lederman, Models for Imposing Corporate Criminal Liability: From Adaptation and Imitation Toward Aggregation and the Search for Self-Identity, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol. 4, page 641 (2000).
+ Strader, The Judicial Politics of White Collar Crime, Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 50, page 1199 (1999).
+ Khanna, Corporate Criminal Liability: What Purpose Does It Serve? Harvard Law Review, Vol. 109, page 1477 (1996)
+ Arlen, The Potentially Perverse Effects of Corporate Criminal Liability, Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 23, page 833 (1994)
+ Bucy, Corporate Ethos: A Standard for Imposing Corporate Criminal Liability, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 75, page 1095 (1991).
+ Brickey, Rethinking Corporate Criminal Liability Under the Model Penal Code, Rutgers Law Journal, Vol. 19, page 593 (1988).
+ Fisse, Reconstructing Corporate Criminal Law: Deterrence, Retribution, Fault, and Sanctions, Southern California Law Review, Vol. 56, page 1141 (1983).
+ Posner, Optimal Sentence for White-Collar Criminal, 17 American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 17, page 409 (1980).
Official Corruption of State and Local Officials
+ Brown, New Federalism's Unanswered Question: Who Should Prosecute State and Local Officials For Political Corruption, Washington & Lee Law Review, Vol. 60, page 417 (2003).
Violence During Sporting Events
+ Harary, Aggressive Play or Criminal Assault? An In Depth Look at Sports Violence and Criminal Liability, Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts, Vol. 25, page 197 (2002).
+ Clarke, Law and Order on the Courts: The Application of Criminal Liability for Intentional Fouls During Sporting Events, Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 32, page 1149 (2000).
Animal Fighting (1)
+ Coleman, Note to Athletes, NFL and NBA: Dog Fighting Is a Crime, Not a Sport, Journal of Animal Law & Ethics, Vol. 3, page 101 (2008).
Children as Victims and Witnesses to Crime
+ Symposium, Children as Victims and Witnesses in the Criminal Trial Process, Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 65, page 1 (2002).
Gun Control
+ Couch & Shughart, Crime, Gun Control, and BATF: The Political Economy of Law Enforcement, Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. XXX, No. 2, page 617 (2003).
Government Handling of Non-Citizens in Times of National Security; Sacrifice of Non-Citizen's Liberty to Further Security of Citizens
+ Cole, Enemy Aliens, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 54, page 953 ( 2002).
+ Solove, Identity Theft, Privacy, and the Architecture of Vulnerability, Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 54, page 1227 (2003).
+ Tigar, The Right of Property and the Law of Theft, Texas Law Review, Vol. 62, page 1143 (1994).
+ Fletcher, The Metamorphosis of Larceny, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 89, page 469 (1976).
+ Pearce, Theft by False Promises, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 101, page 967 (1953).
+ Dmitrieva, Stealing Information: Application of a Criminal Anti-Theft Statute to Leaks of Confidential Government Information, Florida Law Review, Vol. 55, No. 4, page 1043 (2003).
Computer Crime
+ Wiest, The Netsurfing Split:Restrictions Imposed on Internet and Computer Usage by Those Convicted of a Crime Involving a Computer, Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 72, page 847 (2003).
+ Jacobson, Computer Crimes, American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 39, page 273 (2002).
Cybercrime
+ Kerr, Cybercrimes's Scope: Interpreting "Access" and "Authorization" In Computer Misuse Statutes, New York University Law Review, Vol. 78, page 1596 (2003).
+ Katyal, Criminal Law in Cyberspace, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 149, page 1003 (2001).
Criminal Fraud
+ Podgor, Criminal Fraud, American Law Review Vol. 48, No. 4, page 1 (1999).
+ Henning, Maybe It Should Just Be Called Federal Fraud: The Changing Nature of the Mail Fraud Statute, Boston College Law Review, Vol. 36, page 435 (1995).
+Podgor, Mail Fraud:Opening Letters, South Carolina Law Review, Vol. 43, page 223 (1992)
+ Rakoff, The Federal Mail Fraud Statute (Part I), Duquesne Law Review, Vol. 18, page 771 (1980).
+ Berman: The Evidentiary Theory of Blackmail: Taking Motives Seriously, University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 65, page 795 (1998).
+ Fletcher, Blackmail: The Paradigmatic Crime, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 141, page 1617 (1993).
+ Ginsburg, Blackmail: An Economic Analysis of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 141, page 1873 (1993).
+Lindgren, The Theory, History, and Practice of the Bribery -Extortion Distinction, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 141, page 1695 (1993).
+ Lindgren, Unraveling the Paradox of Blackmail, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 84, page 670 ( 1984).
+ Green, Lying, Misleading, and Falsely Denying: How Moral Concepts Inform the Law of Perjury, Fraud, and False Statements, Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 53, page 157 (2001).
+ Franklin, Prostitution and Sex Workers, Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law, Vol. 8, page 355 (2007).
+ Leigh, Sex Work Explored: Rethinking the Laws Regulating Prostitution, Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law, Vol. 8, page 995 (2007).
+ Phoenix, Governing Prostitution: New Formations, Old Agendas, Wisconsin Law Review, page 73 (2007).
+ Streit, Birds of an Illegal Feather: Prostitution and Paid Pornography Should Be Criminalized Together, Cardozo Public Law, Policy and Ethics Journal, Vol. 5, page 729 (2007).
+ Farley, Prostitution, Trafficking and Cultural Amnesia: What We Must Not Know in Order to Keep the Business of Sexual Exploitation Running Smoothly, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, Vol. 18, page 109 (2006).
+ Torgoley, Trafficking and Forced Prostitution: A Manifestation of Modern Slavery, Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 14, page 553 (2006).
+ Abrams, Polygamy, Prostitution and the Federalization of Immigration Law, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 105, page 641 (2005).
+ Larson, Prostitution, Labor and Human Rights, UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 37, page 673 (2004)
+ Becker, A Review of the Prostitution of Sexuality: The Global Exploitation of Women, De Paul Law Review, Vol. 52, page 1043 (2003).
+ Balos, Teaching Prostitution Seriously, New Criminal Law Review (Buffalo Criminal Law Review), Vol. 4, page 709 (2001)
+ Almodovar, For Their Own Good: The Results of the Prostitution Laws as Enforced by Cops, Politicians and Judges, Hastings Women's Law Journal, Vol. 10, page 119 (1999).
+ Baldwin, A Million Dollar and an Apology: Prostitution and Public Benefits Claims, Hastings Women's Law Journal, Vol. 10, page 189 (1999).
+ Bernstein, What's Wrong with Prostitution? What's Right with Sex Work? Comparing Markets in Female Sexual Labor, Hastings Women's Law Journal, Vol. 10, page 91 (1999).
+ Lefler, Shining the Spotlight on Johns: Moving Toward Equal Treatment of Male Customers and Female Prostitutes, Hastings Women's Law Journal, Vol. 10, page 11 (1999).
+ Drexler, Government's Role in Turning Tricks: The World's Oldest Profession in the Netherlands and the Untied States, Dickinson Journal of International Law, Vol. 15, page 201 (1996).
+ Baldwin, A Date with Justice: Prostitution and the Decriminalization Debate, Cardozo Women's Law Journal, Vol. 1, page 125 (1993).
+Dworkin, Prostitution and Male Supremacy, Michigan Journal of Gender and Law, Vol. 1, page 1 (1993).
Hunter, Prostitution Is Cruelty and Abuse to Women and Children, Michigan Journal of Gender and Law, Vol. 1, page 91 (1993).
+ Leidholdt, Prostitution: A Violation of Women's Human Rights, Cardozo Women's Law Journal, Vol. 1, page 133 (1993).
+ Henkin, Morals and the Constitution: The Sin of Obscenity, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 63, page 391 (1963).
+ Sunstein, Pornography and the First Amendment, Duke Law Journal, page 589 (1986).
+ Kane, Reasonable Doubt and Other Shibboleths, Litigation, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 22 (2002).
+ Corwin, Defining "Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt" for the Criminal Jury, Villanova Law Review, Vol. 46, page 829 (2001).
+ Solan, Refocusing the Burden of Proof in Criminal Cases: Some Doubt About Reasonable Doubt, Texas Law Review, Vol. 78, page 105 (1999).
+ Mulrine, Reasonable Doubt: How in the World Is If Defined?, American University Journal of International Law & Policy, Vol. 12, page 195 (1997).
Underwood, The Thumb on the Scales of Justice: Burdens of Persuasion in Criminal Cases, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 86, page 1299 (1977).
+ Stone-Manista, Protecting Pregnant Women; A Guide to Successfully Challenging Criminal Child Abuse Prosecutions of Pregnant Drug Addicts, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Vo. 99, No. 3, page 823 (2009).
+ Nourse, Reconceptualizing Criminal Law Defenses, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 151, No. 5, page 1691 (2003).
+ Falk, Novel Theories of Criminal Defense Based Upon the Toxicity of the Social Environment: Urban Psychosis, Television, Intoxication, and Black Rage, North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 74, page 731 (1996).
+ Comment, Premenstrual Syndrome: The Debate Surrounding Criminal Defense, Maryland Law Review, Vol. 54, page 571 (1995).
+ Holtzman, Premenstrual Symptoms: No Legal Defense, St. Johns Law Review, Vol. 60, page 712 (1986).
+ Riley, Premenstrual Syndrome as a Legal Defense, Hamline Law Review, Vol. 9, page 193 (1986).
+ Delgado, "Rotten Social Background": Should the Criminal Law Recognize a Defense of Severe Environmental Deprivation?, Law and Inequality, Vol. 3, page 9 (1985).
+ Robinson, Criminal Law Defenses: A Systematic Analysis, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 82, page 199 (1982).
+ Jeffries, Defenses, Presumptions and Burdens of Proof in the Criminal Law, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 88, page 1325 (1979).
+ Hruschka, Justification and Excuse: A Systematic Approach, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 2, page 407 (2005).
+ Baron, Justifications and Excuses, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 2, page 387 (2005).
+Milhizer, Justification and Excuse: What They Were, What They Are, and What They Ought to Be, St. John's Law Review, Vol.78, page 725 (2004).
+ Berman, Justification and Excuse, Law and Morality, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 53, No.1 (2003).
+ Dressler, Justifications and Excuses: A Brief Review of the Concepts and the Literature, Wayne Law Review, Vol. 33, page 1155 (1987).
Excuse
+ Kadish, Excusing Crime, California Law Review, Vol. 75 , page 257 (1987).
+ Gur-Arye, Reliance on a Lawyer's Mistaken Advice - Should it be an Excuse from Criminal Liability?, American Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 29, page 455 (2002).
+ Kahan, Ignorance of the Law is Excuse - But Only for the Virtuous, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 96, page 127 (1997).
+ Simons, Mistake and Impossibility, Law and Fact, and Culpability: A Speculative Essay, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 81, page 469 (1990)
+ Dutile & Moore, Mistake and Impossibility, Arranging a Marriage Between Two Difficult Partners, 74 Northwestern Law Review 166 (1979).
+ Westin, Engelhoff Again, American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 36, page 1203 (1999).
+Nemerson, Alcoholism, Intoxication, and the Criminal Law, Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 10, page 393 (1988).
+ Klein, Unreasonable: Involuntary Medications, Incompetent Criminal Defendants, and the Fourth Amendment, San Diego Law Review, Vol. 46, No. 1, page 161 (2009).
+ King, Candor, Zeal and Substitution of Judgment: Ethics and the Mentally Ill Criminal Defendant, American University Law Review, Vol. 58, page 207 (2008).
+ Predicting Restorability of Incompetent Criminal Defendant, Journal of the Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 35, No. 1, page 34 (2007).
+ Phillips, et al, The Insanity of the Mens Rea Model: Due Process and the Abolition of the Insanity Defense, Pace Law Review, Vol. 28, No. 3 , page 455 (2008).
+ Resnick, The Andrea Yates Case: Insanity on Trial, Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 55, No. 2, page 147 (2007).
+ Bienstock, Mothers Who Kill Their Children and Postpartum Psychosis, Southwestern University Law Review, Vol. 32, No,. 3, page 451 (2003).
+ Denno, Who Is Andrea Yates? A Short Story About Insanity, Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, Vol. 10, page 1 (2003).
+ Slobogin, The Integrationist Alternative to the Insanity Defense: Reflections on the Exculpatory Scope of Mental Illness in the Wake of the Andrea Yates Trial, American Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 30, page 315 (2003).
+ Keram, The Insanity Defense and Game Theory: Reflections on Texas v.Yates, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp 470 (2002).
+ Slobogin, An End to Insanity: Recasting the Role of Mental Disability in Criminal Cases, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 86, page 1199 (2000).
+ Perlin, Unpacking the Myths: The Symbolism Mythology of Insanity Defense Jurisprudence, Case Western Reserve Law Review, Vol. 40, page 599 (1989-1990)
+ Steelman, A Question of Revenge: Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy and a Proposed Diminished Capacity Defense for Homicidal Mothers, Cardozo Women's Law Journal, Vol. 8, page 261 (2002).
+ Mendez, Diminished Capacity in California: Premature Reports of Its Demise, Stanford Law and Policy Review, Vol. 3, page 216 (1991).
+ Dressler, Reaffirming the Moral Legitimacy of the Doctrine of Diminished Capacity: A Brief Reply to Professor Morse, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Vol 75, page 953 (1984).
+ Morse, Undiminished Confusion in Diminished Capacity, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 75, page 1 (1984).
+ Arenella, The Diminished Capacity and Diminished Responsibility Defenses: Two Children of a Doomed Marriage, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 77, page 827 (1977).
+ Scott, Blaming Youth, Texas Law Review, Vol. 81, page 799 (2003).
+ Duncan, "So Young and So Untender": Remorseless Children and the Expectations of the Law, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 102, page 1469 (2002).
+ Ferzan, Self-Defense and the State, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Volume 5, page 449 (2008).
+Kaufman, Self-Defense, Imminence, and the Battered Woman, New Criminal Law Review, Vol. 10, No. 3, page 342 (2007).
+ Goodmark, The Punishment of Dixie Shanahan: Is There Justice for Battered Women Who Kill?, Kansas Law Review, Vol. 55, page 269 (2007).
+ Dressler, Battered Women and Sleeping Abusers: Some Reflections, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 3, page 457 (2006).
+ Florida's Protection of Persons Bill, Harvard Journal on Legislation, Vol. 43, page 199 (2006).
+ Ferzan, Justifying Self-Defense, 24 Law and Philosophy 711 (2005).
+ Moriarty, "While Dangers Gather": The Bush Preemption Doctrine, Battered Women, Imminence, and Anticipatory Self-Defense, New York University Review of Law and Social Change, Vol. 30, page 22 (2005).
+ Segev, Fairness, Responsibility and Self-Defense, Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 45 , No. 2, page 383 (2005).
+ Nourse, Self-Defense and Subjectivity, University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 68, page 1235 (2001).
+ McCoy, The Homosexual-Advance Defense and Hate Crimes Statutes:Their Interaction and Conflict, Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 22, pp. 629 (2001).
+ Getman & Marshall, The Continuing Assault on the Right to Strike, Texas Law Review, Vol. 79, page 703 (2001).
+Faigman, et al, The Battered Woman's Syndrome in the Age of Science, Arizona Law Review, Vol. 39, page 67 (1997).
+ Siegal, The Rule of Love: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 105, page 2117 (1996).
+ Williams, Controlling the Use of Non-Deadly Force: Policy and Practice, Harvard BlackLetter Law Journal, Vol. 10, page 79 (1993).
+Dowd, Dispelling the Myths About the "Battered Woman's Defense": Towards a New Understanding, Fordam Urban Law Journal, Vol. 19, page 567 (1992).
+ McCord, Moral Reasoning and the Criminal Law: The Example of Self-Defense, American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 30, page 97 (1992).
+ Walker, Battered Women Syndrome and Self-Defense, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, Vol.6, page 321 (1992).
+ Maguigan, Battered Women and Self-Defense: Myths and Misconceptions in Current Reform Proposals , University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 140, page 79 (1991).
+ Rosen, On Self-Defense, Imminence and Women Who Kill Their Batterers, North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 71, page 371 (1993).
+ Allard,Rethinking Battered Woman Syndrome: A Black Feminist Perspective, UCLA Women's Law Journal, Vol. 1, page 191 (1991).
Mahoney, Legal Images of Battered Women: Redefining the Issue of Separation, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 90, page 1 (1991).
+ Kochan, Beyond the Battered Woman Syndrome: An Argument for the Development of New Standards and the Incorporation of a Feminine Approach to Ethics, Hastings Women's Law Journal, Vol. 1, page 89 (1989).
+ Singer, The Resurgence of Mens Rea: II - Honest But Unreasonable Mistake of Fact in Self-Defense, Boston College Law Review, Vol. 28, page 459 (1987).
+ Faigman, The Battered Women Syndrome and Self-Defense, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 72, page 619 (1986).
+ Schneider, Describing and Changing: Women's Self-Defense Work and the Problem of Expert Testimony on Battering, Women's Rights Law Reporter, Vol. 9, page 195 (1986).
+ Taylor, Provoked Reason in Men and Women: Heat-of-Passion Manslaughter and Imperfect Self-Defense, UCLA Law Review, Vol. 33, page 1679 (1986).
+ Carpenter, Of the Enemy Within, The Castle Doctrine, and Self-Defense, Marquette Law Review, Vol 86, No. 4, page 653 (2003).
+ Green, Castles and Carjackers: Proportionality and the Use of Deadly Force in Defense of Dwellings and Property, 1999 University of Illinois Law Review, page 1.
+ Blum, Scott v. Harris: Death Knell for Deadly Force Policies and Garner Jury Instructions?, Syracuse Law Review, Vol. 58, No. 1, page 45 (2007).
+ Pollard, Banning Child Corporal Punishment, Tulane Law Review, Vol. 77, page 575 (2003).
+ Pollard, Banning Corporal Punishment: A Constitutional Analysis, American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 52, No. 2, page 447 (2002).
+ Bartman, Spare the Rod and Spoil the Child? Corporal Punishment in Schools Around the World, Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, page 283 (2002).
+ Bergelson, Autonomy, Dignity, and Consent to Harm, Rutgers Law Review, Vol 60, page 723 (2008).
+ Bergelson, The Right to Be Hurt:Testing the Boundaries of Consent, George Washington Law Review, Vol. 75, page 165 (2007).
+ Mikos, On the Limits of Supremacy: Medical Marijuana and the States' Overlooked Power to Legalize Federal Crime, Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 62, page 1421 (2009).
+ Quigley, The Necessity Defense in Civil Disobedience Cases: Bring in the Jury, New England Law Review, Vol. 38, Page 3 (2003).
+ Herman, United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyer's Cooperative, Whatever Happened to Federalism?, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 95, page 121 (2002).
+ Parry, et al, Interrogating Suspected Terrorists: Should Torture Be An Option?, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 63, page 743 (2002).
+ Simeone, "Survivors" of the Eternal Sea: A Short True Story, St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 45, page 1123 (2001)
+ Fuller, The Case of the Speluncean Explorers, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 4 (1949). and The Case of the Speluncean Explorers: A Fiftieth Anniversary Symposium, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 12, page 1834 (1999).
+ Christie, The Defense of Legal Necessity Considered from the Legal and Moral Points of View, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 48, page 975 (1999).
+ Bauer, The State Made Me Do It: The Applicability of the Necessity Defense to Civil Disobedience, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 39, Page 1173 (1987).
+ von Hirsch, Lifeboat Law, Criminal Justice Ethics, Vol. 4, page 88 (1985).
+ Dolinko, Intolerable Conditions as a Defense to Prison Escape, UCLA Law Review, Vol. 26, page 1126 (1979).
+ Fletcher, Should Intolerable Prison Conditions Generate a Justification or an Excuse for Escape, UCLA Law Review, Vol. 26, page 1355 (1979).
+ Mulroy, The Duress Defense's Uncharted Terrain: Applying It to Murder, Felony Murder, and the Mentally Retarded Defendant, San Diego Law Review, Vol. 43, page 159 (2006).
+ Westen & Mangiafico, The Criminal Defense of Duress: A Justification, Not an Excuse - And Why It Matters, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol. 6, page 833 (2003).
+ Dressler, Exegesis of the Law of Duress: Justifying the Excuse and Searching for Its Proper Limits, Southern
California Law Review, Vol. 62, page 1331 (1989).
+ Dressler, Professor Delgado's "Brainwashing" Defense: Courting a Determinist Legal System, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 63, page 335 (1979).
+ Delgado, Ascription of Criminal States of MInd: Toward a Defense Theory for the Coercively Persuaded ("Brainwashed") Defendant, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 63, page 1 (1978).
+ Sherman, "A Person Otherwise Innocent": Policing Entrapment In Preventive, Undercover Counterterrorism, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 11, page 1475 (2009).
+ Carter, To Catch the Lion,Tether the Goat: Entrapment, Conspiracy, and Sentence Manipulation, Akron Law Review, Vol. 42, page 135 (2009).
+ Stevenson, Entrapment and Terrorism, Boston College Law Review, Vol. 49, page 125 (2008).
+ Carlton, Entrapment, Punishment and the Sadistic State, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 93, page 1081 (2007).
+ McAdams, The Political Economy of Entrapment, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 96, page 107 (2005).
+ Hay, Sting Operations, Undercover Agents, and Entrapment, Missouri Law Review, Vol.70, page 387 (2005).
+ Smith, Psychology, Factfinding and Entrapment, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 103, page 759 (2005).
+ Colquitt, Rethinking Entrapment, American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 41, page 1389 (2004).
+ Marcus, The Entrapment Defense, Ohio Northern University Law Review, Vol. 30, page 211 (2004).
+ Stevenson, Entrapment and the Problem of Deterring Police Misconduct, Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 37, page 67 (2004).
+ Ross, Valuing Inside Knowledge: Police Infiltration as a Problem for the Law of Evidence, Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 79, page 1111 (2004).
+ Deis, Economics, Causation, and the Entrapment Defense, 2001 University of Illinois Law Review 1207 (2001).
+ Tawil, "Ready? Induce. Sting!": Arguing for the Government's Burden of Proving Readiness in Entrapment Cases, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 98, page 2371 (2000).
+ Ponsoldt & Marsh, Entrapment Where the Spoken Word Is the Crime, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 68, page 1199 (2000).
Cultural Defense
+ Held, On the Boundaries of Culture as an Affirmative Defense, Arizona Law Review, Vol. 51, page 237 (2009).
+ Volpp, On Culture, Difference, and Domestic Violence, American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & Law, Vol. 11, page 393 (2003).
+ Chiu, The Cultural Defense: Beyond Exclusion, Assimilation, and Guilty Liberalism, California Law Review, Vol. 82, page 1053 (1994).
+ Volpp, Misidentifying Culture: Asian Women and the "Cultural Defense", Harvard Women's Law Journal, Vol. 17, page 57 (1994).
+ Renteln, A Justification of the Cultural Defense as Partial Excuse, California Review of Law & Women's Studies, Vol. 2, page 437 (1993).
+ Delgado, "Rotten Social Background": Should the Criminal Law Recognize a Defense of Severe Environmental Deprivation?, Law and Inequality Journal, Vol. 3, page 9 (1985).
Property Rights in Information
+ Moohr, Federal Criminal Fraud and the Development of Intangible Property Rights in Information, 2000 University of Illinois Law Review 683.
Civil Commitment Based On Sexual Dangerousness
+ Maas, Erosion of Constitutional Rights in Commitment of Sex Offenders, William Mitchell Law Review, Vol. 29, No. 4, page 1241 (2000).
Individual Rights and Terrorism Prevention
+ Abrams, The Material Support Terrorism Offenses: Perspectives Derived from the (Early) Model Penal Code, J. Nat'l Sec. L., Vol. 1, page 5 (2005).
+ Schmid, Terrorism - The Definitional Problem, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 36, page 375 (2004).
+ Civil Liberties and the Terrorism Prevention Paradigm: The Guilt By Association Critique, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 101 (2003).
+ Martinez, Prosecuting Terrorists at the International Criminal Court: Possibilities and Problems, Rutgers Law Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1, page 1 (2002).
Probation and Procreation
+ Miles, Criminal Consequences for Making Babies:Probation Conditions that Restrict Procreation, Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 4, page 1545 (2003).
MPC Sentencing
+ Reitz, American Law Institute, Model Penal Code: Sentencing, Plan for Revision, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol. 6 , No. 1, page 525 (2002).
+ Denno, The Lethal Injection Quandry: How Medicine Has Dismantled the Death Penalty, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 76, No. 1, page 49 (2007).
+ Tobolowsky, The Road to Atkins and Beyond in Texas - The Tale of One Mentally Retarded Capital Offender, Baylor Law Review , Vol. 59, No. 3, page 735 (2007).
+ Fagan, et al, Capital Punishment and Capital Murder: Market Share and the Deterrent Effects of the Death Penalty, Texas Law Review, Vol. 84, page 1803 (2006).
+ Ethics and Empirics of Capital Punishment A series of four articles in the Stanford Law Review (December 2005).
+ Zimring, The Unexamined Death Penalty: Capital Punishment and Reform of the Model Penal Code, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 105, No. 4, page 1396 (2005).
+ Aumann, Death by Peers: The Extension of the Sixth Amendment to Capital Sentencing in Ring v. Arizona, Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal, Vol. 34, No. 4, page 845 (2003).
+ Capital Punishment and the Diagnosis of Mental Retardation, Atkins v. Virginia, Jurimetrics, Vol. 43, No. 4, page 415 (2003).
+ Despotes, Applying Atkins v. Virginia to Juvenile Defendants: The End Is Near for the Constitutionality of Executing Juveniles, McGeorge Law Review, Vol. 34, No. 4 page 851 (2003).
+ Aarons, Reflections on the Killing State: A Cultural Study of the Death Penalty in the Twentieth Century United States, Tennessee Law Review, Vol. 70, No. 2, page 391 (2003).
+ Symposium - Victims and the Death Penalty: Inside and Outside the Courtroom, Cornell Law Review, Vol. 88, No. 2 (2003). (13 excellent articles with an emphasis on the use of victim impact evidence in capital cases).
+ Steiker, Sober Second Thoughts: Reflections on Two Decades of Constitutional Regulation of Capital Punishment, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 109, page 355 (1995).
Lempert, Deterrence and Desert: An Assessment of the Moral Bases for Capital Punishment, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 79, pages 1177 (1981).
Comparative Criminal Liability
+ Final Report of the Maldivian Penal Law and Sentencing Codification Project 2006 ( A new Islamic Penal Code for the Maldives prepared by the University of Pennsylvania Law School Criminal Law Group).
+ Bergelson, Victims and Perpetrators: An Argument for Comparative Liability in Criminal Law, 8 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 385 (2005); Bergelson, Conditional Rights and Comparative Wrongs: More on the Theory and Application of Comparative Liability, 8 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 567 (2005).
+ Nestler, Sentencing in Germany, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol. 7, page 109 (2004).
Victim's Rights
+ Dubber, The Victim in American Penal Law: A Systematic Overview, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol. 3, page 3 (2000).
+ Henderson, The Wrongs of Victim's Rights, Stanford Law Review, Vol.37, page 937 (1985).
Repentance
+ Bader, "Forgive me Victim for I Have Sinned": Why Repentance and the Criminal Justice System Do Not Mix - A Lesson from Jewish Law, 31 Fordham Urb. L. J. 69 (2003).
Deterrence
+ Robinson & Darley, The Role of Deterrence in the Formulation of Criminal Law Rules: At Its Worst When Doing Its Best, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 91, No. 5 , page 949 (2003).
Sentencing
+ Symposium on Model Penal Code's Sentencing Proposals, Florida Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 4, page 665 (2009).
+ Berman, The Roots and Reality of Blakely, Criminal Justice, Vol. 19, page 56 (2005).
+ Etienne, The Declining Utility of the Right to Counsel in Federal Criminal Courts: An Empirical Study on the Diminished Role of Defense Attorney Advocacy Under the Sentencing Guidelines, California Law Review, Vol. 92, No. 2, page 323 (2004).
+ Marcus, Comments on the Model Penal Code: Sentencing Preliminary Draft No. 1 , American Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 30, No. 2, page 135 (2003).
+ Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law Symposium: Mercy and Clemency.
+ 2004 Stanford Law Review Symposium: Punishment and Its Purpose (April 2004).
+ Stinneford, The Originial Meaning of "Unusual": The Eighth Amendment as a Bar to Cruel Innovation, Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 102, page 1739 (2008).
+ Francis et al, The Optimal Penalty for Sexually Transmitting HIV, American Law and Economics Review, Vol. 10, No. 2, page 388 (2008).
+ Carlsmith, et al, The Function of Punishment in the "Civil" Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, Vol. 25, page 437 (2007).
+ Meares, et al, Updating the Study of Punishment, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 56, page 1171 (2004).
+ Hoffman, The Case for Jury Sentencing, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 52, page 951 (2003).
+ Fishman, Old Testament Justice, Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 51, page 405 (2002).
+Kay, The Agony of Ectasy: Reconsidering the Punitive Approach to United States Drug Policy, Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 29, page 2133 (2002).
+ Kennedy, Making the Punishment Fit the Crime, Emory Law Journal, Vol. 51, page 753 (2002).
+ Olson, Rethinking Mandatory Minimums after Apprendi, Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 96, page 811 (2002).
+ Strauss, Losing Sight of the Utilitarian Forest for the Retributivist Trees: An Analysis of the Role of Public Opinion in a Utilitarian Model of Punishment, Cardozo Law Review, Vol 23, page 1549 (2002).
+ Cotton, Back with a Vengeance: The Resilience of Retribution as an Articulated Purpose of Criminal Punishment, American Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 37, page 1313 (2000).
+ Finkelsein, Positivism and the Notion of an Offense, California Law Review, Vol. 99, page 335 (2000).
+ Simons, The Relevance of Community Values to Just Deserts: Criminal Law, Punishment Rationales, and Democracy, Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 28, page 635 (2000).
+ Harcourt, The Collapse of the Harm Principle, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 90, page 109 (1999).
+ Donohue, Allocating Resources Among Prisons and Social Programs in the Battle Against Crime, Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 27, page 1 (1998).
+ Whitman, What Is Wrong with Inflicting Shame Sanctions?, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 107, page 1055 (1998).
+ Kahan, What Do Alternative Sanctions Mean?, University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 63, page 591 (1996).
+ Massaro, Shame, Culture and American Criminal Law, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 89, page 1880 (1991).
+ Feinberg, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law - Harmless Wrongdoing, Oxford University Press (1988).
+ Gruner, To Let the Punishment Fit the Organization: Sanctioning Corporate Offenders Through Corporate Probation, American Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 16, page 1 (1988).
+ Feinberg, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law - Harm to Self, Oxford University Press (1986).
+ Feinberg, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law - Offense to Others, Oxford University Press (1985).
+ Feinberg, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law - Harm to Others, Oxford University Press (1984).
+ Coffee, "No Soul to Damn;No Body to Kick": An Unscandalized Inquiry into the Problem of Corporate Punishment, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 79, page 386 (1981).
+ Nagel, The Enforcement of Morals, The Humanist, Vol. 3, page 20 (1968).
+ Packer, The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, Stanford University Press (1968).
+ Morris, The Honest Politician's Guide to Crime Control, University of Chicago Press (1970).
+ Andenaes, The Morality of Deterrence, University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 37, page 649 (1970).
+ Menninger, The Crime of Punishment, Viking Press (1966).
+ Andenaes, The General Preventive Effects of Punishment, University of Pennsylvania, Vol. 114, page 949 (1966).
+ Devlin, The Enforcement of Morals, Oxford University Press (1965).
+ H.L.A. Hart, Law, Liberty, and Morality, Stanford University Press (1963).
+ Henry M. Hart, The Aims of the Criminal Law, Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 23, page 401 (1958).
+ H.L.A. Hart, Murder and the Principles of Punishment: England and the United States, Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 52. pages 433 (1957).
Torture
+ Rumann, Tortured History: Finding Our Way Back to the Lost Origins of the Eighth Amendment, Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 31, page 661 (2004).
Private Prisons
+ Dolovich, State Punishment and Private Prisons, 55 Duke Law Journal 439 (2005).
crimesanddefenses.com
Criminal Law Bibliography
Law Review Articles, News
Best Blawgs, Scholarly Publications
copyright © ray moses 2001-2009
